Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa BG 4500X

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa BG
Spinning
55.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.83 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank109 centimeter / 42.91 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €117.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/320
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX and Daiwa BG 4500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa BG 4500X stands out for a durability of 7.83 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa BG?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa BG 4500X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
