Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
