Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX

Spinning

62.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano TLD II A

Multireels

88.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.4 out of 10

Gear ratio3.5:1 / 1.4:1

Maximum drag37kg / 81.57lbs

Weight1625g / 57.32oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €285.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size50 II
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (37kg / 81,57lbs). While Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.