Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R

Shimano FX

Spinning

62.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R

Spinning

29.20 out of 100

Value for money2 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight375g / 13.23oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €53.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 DH
Handle typeDouble handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Conclusion

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (250g / 8,82oz) and ergonomics (6.17 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R?

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX

Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Solid value at €18.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs