Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
