Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Mitchell 308 2000X
