Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX
