Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.89 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Delphin YUPIE vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
