Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
