Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
