Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX
