Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter / 33.46 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €479.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.7:1) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
