Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
51.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.67 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Daiwa GS LTD 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Daiwa GS LTD 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa GS LTD?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Daiwa GS LTD 4000X
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
