Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Delphin CarbonIX?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
