Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin INKS 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX
