Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano AERO XR 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano AERO XR 4000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Delphin RAYA body vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
