Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- With a weight score of 9.19 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz), this reel is impressively light for saltwater and provides great comfort
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
