Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano FX?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
