Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Shimano FX 3000 FCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano FX 3000 FCX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano FX?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano FX 3000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX
