Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX offers a maximum drag of 18kg / 39,68lbs, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (18kg / 39,68lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
