Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
