Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Daiwa TANACOM 1200X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, while Daiwa TANACOM 1200X stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa TANACOM?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
