Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX edges out Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1 / 3.1:1) and the ball bearings (6+1). Still, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 170g / 6oz and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Shimano Talica 20II CAM?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- Higher gear ratio of 5.2:1 / 3.1:1 (scoring 9.4 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
