Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
