Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Beastmaster
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Beastmaster?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
