Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
