Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a total score of 7.96 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
