Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
