Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.89 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch and a weight of 265g / 9,35oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
