Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

65.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight240g / 8.47oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Delphin SHARX

Spinning

54.70 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.09 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight273g / 9.63oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €69.95
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Conclusion

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X edges out Delphin SHARX 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the ball bearings (4+1). Still, Delphin SHARX 4000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a durability of 7 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Delphin SHARX?

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X

With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency