Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 105 centimeter / 41.34 inch, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
