Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a total score of 7.96 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
