Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 240g / 8,47oz and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Aero C3000X
