Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
27.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.66 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €83.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX clearly outshines Daiwa GS LTD 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (6.2:1). While Daiwa GS LTD 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa GS LTD?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
