Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 3000X
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X
Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 3000X
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X