Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1 / 3.1:1) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Talica 20II CAM?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- Higher gear ratio of 5.2:1 / 3.1:1 (scoring 9.4 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
