Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.69 out of 10) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X
