Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX edges out Shimano 19 Stella 30000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Shimano 19 Stella 30000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano 19 Stella?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
