Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

64.50 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.0:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 6.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX

6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues