Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

64.50 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.0:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Delphin SHARX

Spinning

54.70 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.09 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight273g / 9.63oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €69.95
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX offers a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Delphin SHARX?

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX

Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues