Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Mitchell 308 2000X
