Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.0:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
