Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

63.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000FJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues