Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.86 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
