Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (138g / 4,87oz). While Shimano Sienna 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sienna and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sienna 4000X
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.08 out of 10 (138g / 4,87oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
