Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 25/215

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
