Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight730g / 25.75oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €205.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size12II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/350

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.73 out of 10 (106 centimeter / 41.73 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
