Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.73 out of 10 (106 centimeter / 41.73 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
