Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
