Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1025g / 36.16oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €295.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/550

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X
