Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1025g / 36.16oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €295.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/550

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
